Optimizing LoRa APRS Tracker for Maximum Battery Life

As an avid user of LoRa APRS trackers, I’ve dedicated considerable time to fine-tuning my device to ensure it operates efficiently while conserving battery life. This is particularly crucial for long-duration outdoor activities where access to charging may be limited. In this post, I’ll share my insights on optimizing various settings—including spreading factor, coding rate, power (dBm) settings, and wide path configuration—to achieve the best battery performance.

1. Understanding Spreading Factor (SF)

The spreading factor is a critical parameter in LoRa communication that dictates how the signal is spread over time, affecting range, reliability, and robustness of the transmission.

• Higher Spreading Factor: In my case, the local digipeater and iGate operate on Spreading Factor 12 (SF12). This setting allows for longer distances and better penetration through obstacles, which is invaluable for tracking in areas with varying terrain or urban interference. However, a higher SF also results in longer transmission times and increased battery consumption.
• Compatibility Requirement: Since Malaysian APRS infrastructure operates on SF12, my tracker must also be set to SF12 to ensure successful communication. Unfortunately, this means I cannot switch to a lower spreading factor, such as SF7, which could help save battery life but would not be compatible with the network.

Chart: Spreading Factor vs. Range and Battery Consumption (Estimation)

2. The Role of Coding Rate (CR)

The coding rate, expressed as a ratio (e.g., 4/5), indicates how much redundancy is added to the data for error correction. It plays a vital role in ensuring reliable data transmission.

• Optimal Balance: A coding rate of 4/5 is particularly advantageous for battery savings. This coding rate strikes a balance between sending sufficient redundancy to ensure reliable communication while minimizing the amount of data transmitted. When using a lower redundancy rate, my tracker can transmit packets more quickly, which in turn reduces the on-air time and conserves battery power.
• Trade-Offs: It’s important to note that while a higher coding rate (e.g., 4/6 or 4/7) may enhance reliability, it also increases the transmission time. Therefore, choosing the right coding rate is essential to balance reliability and power consumption.

Chart: Coding Rate vs. Transmission Time (Estimation)

3. Choosing Power (dBm) Settings

The dBm value represents the transmission power of the device. Adjusting the transmission power can significantly impact battery life.

• Lowering Transmission Power: By reducing the dBm setting, I can decrease the power consumed during transmission. For example, using a lower transmission power of 16 dBm instead of 20 dBm can extend battery life, especially in areas where the signal strength is sufficient for communication.
• Impact on Range: While reducing the dBm setting can save battery, it’s crucial to ensure that the signal remains strong enough for reliable communication. If I’m in an area with good coverage, lowering the dBm setting is a practical way to extend the time between battery charges.

Chart: Power Settings vs. Range (Estimation)

4. Configuring Wide Path Settings

The wide path setting determines how many digipeaters (or hops) the packets traverse. This can significantly impact battery consumption.

• Narrow vs. Wide Path: Using a wider path (e.g., WIDE2-1) may allow my packets to travel through more digipeaters, but this can result in longer transmission times and increased power consumption. To optimize battery life, I prefer using a narrower path setting (like WIDE1-1), which limits the number of hops and thus reduces overall power consumption.
• Network Considerations: It’s essential to assess the APRS network coverage in your area. In regions with robust coverage, a narrower path can still achieve reliable communication while conserving battery life.

Chart: Wide Path Configuration and Battery Life

73,

9M2PJU